[ad_1]
For immediate release:
August 17, 2021
Contact:
Nicole Meyer 202-483-7382
Salisbury, Maryland. – This morning, PETA, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), filed a lawsuit against Maryland’s Lower East Coast Three Counties Council and one of its divisions, Shore Transit, over their refusal to advertise PETA on their buses. Shore Transit said PETA’s ad, which said “No one should kill to eat,” and called for the closure of slaughterhouses, was “too offensive for [its] market and political in nature ”.
PETA’s lawsuit alleges that the Trieste County Council and Shore Transit’s advertising policy and their refusal to advertise PETA under this policy violates PETA’s rights under the First and 14 Rules.th Amendments. Accordingly, the group is asking the court to order the Trieste County Council and Shore Transit to run ads and prohibit them from applying bans on ads that they consider “political,” “offensive,” “controversial,” “objectionable.” or “bad taste,” as PETA argues, these bans are unconstitutionally vague, inherently discriminatory, and entirely at the discretion of government officials. PETA views the slaughter of animals as offensive, controversial, undesirable and bad taste and takes the statement “No one should kill to eat” as fact.
“In a land of free speech, Shore Transit cannot block calls for an end to animal cruelty depending on whether its officials agree or not,” says PETA Foundation litigation director Asher Smith. “PETA is pushing for the restoration of our First Amendment rights and the ability to encourage Shore Transit riders to save animal lives by becoming vegan.”
PETA is represented by Brian Hauss of the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project and Robin Cockay of Cockey, Brennan & Maloney, PC.
PETA, whose motto is in part that “the animals are not ours to eat” – opposes arrogance, a worldview focused on human superiority. For more information please visit PETA.org or subscribe to the group on Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram…
[ad_2]
Source link